Independent software researchsalesfitlab.com
Illustrative workflow · not a customer case

A B2B team researching its first account sample

A small software company has a narrow business-customer profile, a reviewed offer and a shared CRM. It lacks verified company and relevant-role information for a small sample.

Edition date:

Use the complete example

Review the designed inputs in the fit finder, then adapt them to your own team.

Open this example in the fit finder

The first practical move

Define company criteria, exclusion criteria and the fields required. Review ten accounts manually and record match reasons, missing data and verification dates. Keep the research separate from sending.

Why the category boundary matters

Apollo is a research candidate for this information gap. Consumer messaging automation does not match the starting signal. A later execution requirement needs its own contact-basis and reply-handling review.

What the pilot should measure

Verified matches, missing fields, stale data and research time per usable account.

This is a designed example, not a report of customer use, provider testing or measured performance. Replace the assumptions with your actual conditions before making a purchase.

The assumptions used in this example

These are designed inputs, not a measured customer case. Every assessment answer is listed below. Review the assumptions in the fit finder and change them before applying the plan to your team.

Scroll horizontally to read all columns.

Assessment inputIllustrative answer
What job needs to improve?Research target accounts
Who is on the other side?Small businesses
Where does the work start?Target-account criteria
How many relevant items per month?25–100
How long does a decision usually take?15–60 days
Where is the current record?CRM
Is the contact basis documented for this task?Research only; no campaign sending
What information is missing?Company or business-contact research
How can records move between tools?Reviewed CSV import
Who owns replies and exceptions?A team of 2–5
What is the monthly software budget?$100–$300
Capabilities already availableCRM
Separate production tasksNone selected

Trace one item through the workflow

A hypothetical software team defines an organization type, geography and business responsibility. It researches ten accounts, checks match reasons and flags uncertain fields. No sequence is activated in this research example. The next owner receives only reviewed records and their sources.

A practical setup sequence

  1. Write the organization inclusion rules, exclusions and offer hypothesis.
  2. Create a small company sample before looking for individual roles.
  3. Use company and people criteria deliberately; verify that the relevant responsibility exists.
  4. Record source, review date, uncertainty and a reason to include or reject each account.
  5. Place reviewed records in the CRM with an owner. Review any later sending task separately.

The working record

Scroll horizontally to read all columns.

Part of the recordWhat must remain visible
Account criteriaBusiness model, geography and relevant size or operating conditions
Role hypothesisThe responsibility connected to the offer
VerificationSource URL, review date, uncertainty and accept/reject reason
HandoffDestination record, owner and next reviewed action

What would stop the pilot

Do not expand if a meaningful share of the sample cannot be verified or if ownership and the destination record are unclear. Define a review threshold for the actual pilot; ten accounts is a planning sample, not an industry benchmark.

Count verified company matches, role relevance, missing fields, rejected records and review time. A database count, verified email status or saved list is not evidence of buying intent.

Working files

Blank templates for your own planning. These contain no customer records and are not submitted to Sales Fit Lab.

Requirements and acceptance brief JSON

Use the blank fields for your own task, owner, exception and acceptance conditions.

Sources and review scope

  • Apollo: Search for People

    Documentation for person and company search criteria; sample verification is our proposed process. Reviewed .

Official documentation supports the identified capability only. Proposed workflows and templates are editorial planning guidance, not completed product tests.